Search Results for 'ssl'
-
Search Results
-
Topic: Thumbs up for v5
After my initial annoyance at losing dropbox and iCloud for syncing, I am now very happy with the new Tap Forms!
Cloudant is working brilliantly for me, very fast and so far no issues entering data during my business day via my iPhone 6s and having immediate updates on my Macbook air and iMac is awesome!. Transferring documents wirelessly is also a breeze. I am now able to start to look at the detail and I’m loving it!
Multiple split databases, more personalisation and extra features on my mac is making the whole tapforms 5 experience exciting and fun.Thanks and keep the updates coming
pmtsc
Hi,
I’m just starting with Tap Forms, and it seems really awesome.
I’m building a database using some usual basic structures. Some of them rely on relationships like the one shown in this example:Person (name, phone, [Roles in Projects]) one
to many
Role in a project ([Person], Role, notes, [Project])
to many
Project (name, value, [Roles]) oneSuch architecture is a simple way to link Persons and Projects with a many-to-many relationship, giving a particular quality (the Role) to each single relationship.
In this way, getting into the person Jimmy I can see that his role is Consultant for the project Abbey Grocery, and his role is Client for the project Green Campaign.
Getting into the project Abbey Grocery I can see there’s a role of Consultant played by Jimmy, and a role of Security played by Jack.As you can see, one person can play many roles (each linked with only one project) and one project is linked to many roles (each linked to only one person).
In such basic db structure, which works flawlessly in mysql and access for example, the key is using one-to-many links on both sides. Using many-to-many on one or both sides would be misleading.Maybe I’ve found the same issue in the forum, a thread of 2014 talking about mothers, fathers, and children. In 2014 a child had to have one only parent, or a potentially infinite number of parents. This because in Tap Forms a table couldn’t be linked by two tables in a one-to-many relationship: once set the mother, the father disappears and vice-versa.
I’m experimenting the same issue now, so I can’t translate to Tap Forms the architectures working in all the other database systems I work with, which would be really awesome. Please tell me if I’m missing something, or if this limit’s gonna be fixed, or if there’s an equivalent way I can use to set a table of exclusive links (like Roles) between two main tables (like Persons and Projects).
Thanks a lot.
Hi Brendan
When i can get the latest mac version I want to do so. Please can you tell me where the documentation is to make the switch as painlessly as possible. I am running IOS 8.2. Will the latest ipad version be OK with that as I dont want to go to 8.3 yet!
Cheers
TonyTopic: Field type error
Hi there,
I finally jumped from the burning wreck that was Bento to Tap Forms on my iMac and so far I love it. My database transferred flawlessly and in no time I had the layout sorted. But now I’m having problems with new fields. I can create them just fine, for example, a calculation field to count the number of checks. It works in default layout, but when I try to add the new field to a layout, it places a web address field or check mark, or some other field there that seems to be linked to existing fields on other layouts. I’ve tried it on a new form and it worked OK, until I added more fields. I’ve probably missed something and I’m still learning the program, but I’d be very grateful for any light you could shed on this.
Thanks